Remember...For it is the soldier, not the reporter, who ensures our freedom of the press.
It is the soldier, not the poet, or artist, who ensures our freedom of speech.
It is the soldier, not the community organizer who ensures our freedom to gather and demonstrate.
And lastly…
It is the soldier, who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who ensures the protester’s freedom, to burn that flag.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who give their lives for our freedom. Instead we should thank god that such men exist. - Gen. George S. Patton
Pride
--
Work Fight and Win as One
--
Check out my comic! [link]
--
"If you walk with the grace of a warrior and the confidence of a king those you do not impress you will intimidate." ~ Me
Subsiste Sermonem Statim
--
When earth was born Wolfs ruled all
And from wolfs were born Humans.
The wolf spirit lives in my soul
I AM ONNI GREYWOLF
*Apophysis ~CaliberedFurs ~SaveTheWolfClub ~American-Rebel-Club *dA-Michiganders ~Galra-Armed-Forces
I was just looking at your SpaceWolf comics the other day. It's great to find more of your stuff!
Looking forward to his return!
I think all wikifur users, and the fandom in general, should be made aware of the tactics and dirty tricks the site dictat - excuse me, ADMINISTRATORS - employ to get their way.
'''GREENREAPER''' - changing voting policy after the fact to support the underlings of his dictatorship.
There was no consensus between those debating the issue. The name will be kept, '''because only one of those supporting its removal is an unrelated party and a regular editor of WikiFur with a majority of their edits outside of this topic,''' as opposed to four of those opposing its removal.
Half of those supporting removal had less than 10 edits on WikiFur. Of those who had more, none had more than 200 edits, and only one was not mainly or solely involved with this situation.
Conversely, '''three of those opposing removal are WikiFur administrators with two-year track records and thousands of unrelated edits,''' and one other editor also appears otherwise uninvolved with this conflict.
(These policies WERE NOT stated until AFTER voting was finished, and were used simply to gain an unfair advantage in favor of what he and his fellow controlers wanted.)
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
'''SPIROU''' - removal of votes in favor of redaction, then claiming that he hadn't seen the votes and needed to "contact them to find out".
'''I voted to have his name removed because the recent continuation of this whole facade is becoming unreasonably reaching on the borderline of internet harasment on Mozdoc sake.''' Yes he may of said some things that were regrettable and I understand that you wish to protect users, but to hold someones real life information against their wishes is wrong and most probably illegal. There are websites like Fchan has a DNP list of those who wish not to have their information posted against their wishes.. Moz has told me that he only wants this page to be taken down and that he can move on from this ridiculousness. I already gave him advice to follow if this does continue on beyond Anthrocon.. I wish you luck Moz..
- Dunc (aka Duncan Wulfweards) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.166.142.24 (talk • contribs) 00:38 and 00:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
'''I think its a bit of an invasion of privacy to have Mozodc's real name on here''' for everyone to see. Hellkat9940 05:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
A quick inquiring note has been sent to users Hellcat9940, and Duncan Wulfweards '''to confirm that you have their permission to add their votes''' to the matter at hand. Spirou 20:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
(Duncan Wulfweards made it clear BEYOND ALL DOUBT that he was voting.... for redaction - Yet Spirou deleted his vote ANYWAY)
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
CUBIST - General harrassment & support of dishonest actions by Spirou(re: vote deletion)
Shorter 'Vladuz': "If we don't remove Mozdoc's real name from his Wikifur page, the terrorists win!" Overblown histrionics much, V-boy? I say you're a concern troll, and I say the hell with you. And my vote remains the same. Cubist 11:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
sez mozdoc: "I WAS AHEAD BY ONE VOTE AT THE MORNING OF JULY SEVENTH."
Really? There were seven votes "in your corner" (as it were)? Who is it that cast this elusive seventh vote, please? Cubist 08:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
sez Mozdoc: "Excuse me, but KendricksRedtail shouldn't even be fucking counted in this because his declaration of opposing removal of my name came SEVEN MINUTES AFTER THE 12:01A DEADLINE THAT WE *ALL* AGREED TO." Beggin' yer pardon, Mozdoc, but for some strange reason, I think [a particular edit of Kendricks Redtail's that was timestamped 2 May 2007] just might be relevant to your argument here... Cubist 10:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
(This voting was not in effect on May 2nd, '''2007''', so how can any such edit count towards offsetting Kendrick's voting AFTER the deadline?)
As for my not editing elsewhere, GREENREAPER conveniently leaves out certain facts in his desperate attempt to justify his dishonest and cowardly tactics.
As the situation now stands, wikifur itself is damaging to the reputation of the fandom.
Previous Page12345Next Page